The state appeals the trial court's grant of the defendant's motion to suppress the results of an intoximeter breath test in her prosecution for driving under the influence.
The arresting officer testified that the defendant was informed of her "implied consent" rights at the time of her arrest in accordance with OCGA 40-6-392
(a) (3), (4) and that she declined the optional test when informed she would have to pay for it. The defendant testified that no such advice was given. She also testified that, after being taken to the police station, she had requested and had been denied the opportunity to take a blood test. The trial court based its ruling on the holding of this court in Division 4 of Steed v. City of Atlanta, 172 Ga. App. 839 (325 SE2d 165) (1984)
, that the state must prove an affirmative waiver by the defendant of the right to an independent test. Held:
In the present case, the state's evidence would have satisfied even the now discredited affirmative waiver requirement which Steed purported to impose. It follows that the motion to suppress should have been denied.
William H. Arroyo, Donald Adams, for appellee.