lawskills
Loading
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
ADDY v. ADDY et al.
A95A1227.
BLACKBURN, Judge.
Accounting of commissions. Chatham Probate Court. Before Judge McDuffee.
Bernard Addy, Jr., administrator of the estate of Vennie Lee Davis, appeals the trial court's order which granted his petition for accounting of commissions.
In his petition for accounting of commissions, Addy specifically requested statutory commissions pursuant to OCGA 53-6-140, extraordinary expenses pursuant to OCGA 53-6-150, and repayment of sums advanced for the expenses of the estate including attorney fees and expenses of litigation. The trial court awarded statutory commissions pursuant to OCGA 53-6-140, but awarded no extraordinary expenses pursuant to OCGA 53-6-150, nor any sums for repayment of expenses. Addy admitted that "the vast majority of the extraordinary time and advanced expenses were spent in prosecuting a civil suit." The trial court noted in its order that the judgment in the civil action included a sum of money awarded as attorney fees.
OCGA 53-6-150 provides that "[i]n other cases of extraordinary services, extra compensation may be allowed by the judge of the probate court. . . ." Such an allowance is within the court's discretion, and the trial court must find that the services were truly extraordinary and not merely duties ordinarily incident to the administration of the estate. See Hartford Accident &c. Co. v. Cohran, 106 Ga. App. 14, 21 (126 SE2d 289) (1962); Adair v. St. Amand, 136 Ga. 1, 8 (70 SE 578) (1911). OCGA 53-6-147 provides for the reimbursement of the administrator's actual expenses for required "travel out of his county in the discharge of his duty." However, the probate court must find that such travel was required.
In the present case, the probate court heard argument twice on Addy's petition for accounting and commissions, prior to entering its order. This court has not been provided with transcripts of such hearings, and, on appeal, Addy has failed to present any evidence of an abuse of the trial court's discretion. Therefore, absent a showing of abuse of discretion, the probate court's order is affirmed.
Laura L. Addy, pro se.
Adams & Ellis, Dwight T. Feemster, for appellant.
DECIDED MAY 18, 1995.
Thursday May 21 07:17 EDT


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com