lawskills
Loading
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
MCDONALD et al. v. SIMMONS.
A92A2307.
JOHNSON, Judge.
Action for damages. Jeff Davis Superior Court. Before Judge Tuten.
Edward and Mary McDonald filed this negligence action against Waunell Simmons, seeking damages for injuries sustained by Mr. McDonald when he fell through the floor of a home the appellants rented from Simmons. At trial, evidence of payments to the appellants or for their benefit from various collateral sources was presented to the jury pursuant to OCGA 51-12-1 (b), and the jury was charged on the substance of the statute. On March 15, 1991, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Simmons. On that same day, the Georgia Supreme Court decided Denton v. Con-Way Southern Express, 261 Ga. 41 (402 SE2d 269) (1991). In Denton, the court held OCGA 51-12-1 (b) unconstitutional. That statute was the only authority under Georgia law for admission of collateral source payment evidence. The McDonalds filed a motion for a new trial asserting, inter alia, that the court erred in charging the jury on OCGA 51-12-1 (b). Thereafter, judgment was entered on the verdict and the McDonalds' motion for a new trial was denied. The McDonalds appeal. We reverse.
1. In Anepohl v. Ferber, 202 Ga. App. 552 (415 SE2d 9) (1992), we held that Denton must be applied retroactively to those cases still pending at the time Denton was decided. The appellants are correct in arguing that the holding in Denton should have been applied retroactively to their motion for a new trial. See Tyler v. Roberts, 204 Ga. App. 380, 381 (419 SE2d 103) (1992). Simmons' argument that the appellants waived their objection to the unconstitutional charge because they failed to object to the charge on that ground at trial is without merit. See Roberts v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 205 Ga. App. 594, 595 (423 SE2d 16) (1992); see also Tyler, supra.
2. We need not reach the appellants' remaining enumeration of error in view of our decision in Division 1.
Andrew, Threlkeld & Ellington, Reid A. Threlkeld, John J. Ellington, for appellee.
David B. Pittman, Nathan B. Deaton, Miles, Baker & Morris, Keith M. Morris, for appellants.
DECIDED MARCH 9, 1993.
Saturday May 23 11:22 EDT


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com